Hull Damage: Wet Abrasive Blasting vs. Dry (sand) Blasting
Comparison of blasting methods with regards to maintaining hull integrity.
STRIPPING/BLASTING
1/21/20251 min read


Wet abrasive blasting generally causes less surface damage compared to dry (sand) blasting, making it a gentler option for many applications. Here's how they compare in terms of surface impact:
Reduced Risk of Warping: The water in wet abrasive blasting helps cool the surface being treated, minimizing the risk of heat-induced warping or thermal damage. This is particularly beneficial when working with sensitive materials or surfaces prone to heat damage.
Smoother Finish: Wet abrasive blasting typically produces a smoother, satin finish on most surfaces. The water acts as a cushion, softening the impact of abrasive particles and preventing them from embedding into the surface.
Less Aggressive: Compared to wet abrasive blasting, dry (sand) blasting is more aggressive and more likely to cause unwanted damage to the surface. The water in wet abrasive blasting creates a cushioning effect that reduces the force of impact.
Better for Delicate Surfaces: Wet abrasive blasting is usually preferred for cleaning softer materials that need to be preserved, such as plastic, soft aluminum alloys or wood.
Finer Abrasive Media: Wet abrasive blasting allows for the use of finer abrasive media, which can be more suitable for delicate surfaces or when a higher level of precision is required.
While dry (sand) blasting can be more effective for heavy-duty cleaning and removing stubborn contaminants, wet abrasive blasting offers a balance between effective cleaning and surface preservation, making it an excellent choice for applications where minimizing surface damage is a priority.