Hull Damage: Wet Abrasive Blasting vs. Dry (sand) Blasting

Comparison of blasting methods with regards to maintaining hull integrity.

STRIPPING/BLASTING

1/21/20251 min read

Wet abrasive blasting generally causes less surface damage compared to dry (sand) blasting, making it a gentler option for many applications. Here's how they compare in terms of surface impact:

  1. Reduced Risk of Warping: The water in wet abrasive blasting helps cool the surface being treated, minimizing the risk of heat-induced warping or thermal damage. This is particularly beneficial when working with sensitive materials or surfaces prone to heat damage.

  2. Smoother Finish: Wet abrasive blasting typically produces a smoother, satin finish on most surfaces. The water acts as a cushion, softening the impact of abrasive particles and preventing them from embedding into the surface.

  3. Less Aggressive: Compared to wet abrasive blasting, dry (sand) blasting is more aggressive and more likely to cause unwanted damage to the surface. The water in wet abrasive blasting creates a cushioning effect that reduces the force of impact.

  4. Better for Delicate Surfaces: Wet abrasive blasting is usually preferred for cleaning softer materials that need to be preserved, such as plastic, soft aluminum alloys or wood.

  5. Finer Abrasive Media: Wet abrasive blasting allows for the use of finer abrasive media, which can be more suitable for delicate surfaces or when a higher level of precision is required.

While dry (sand) blasting can be more effective for heavy-duty cleaning and removing stubborn contaminants, wet abrasive blasting offers a balance between effective cleaning and surface preservation, making it an excellent choice for applications where minimizing surface damage is a priority.